Background: Relapse is the primary cause of treatment failure post alloHCT. We sought to identify risk factors that predict relapse of hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) to identify those at highest risk of relapse who may benefit from novel therapies.
Design: This was a single institution, retrospective cohort study of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), mixed phenotypic acute leukemia (MPAL) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who had undergone alloHCT between 1/1/2003 and 12/31/2010. Relapse was defined as any evidence of increasing disease post-alloHCT, including minimal residual disease (MRD). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test used to assess univariate associations with various characteristics. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors jointly associated with RFS.
Results: Of 70 children who underwent a myeloablative HCT for MDS or acute leukemia in complete remission at the time of HCT, 24 (34%) relapsed at a median of 214 days (range 1 month- 57 months) post-HCT. Relapse rates by disease were 14/31 (45%) for ALL; 7/26 (27%) for AML; 3/9 (33%) for MPAL; 0/4 (0%) for MDS. Univariate analysis demonstrated that black race, central nervous system (CNS) disease at diagnosis (Figure 1), greater number of regimens given to induce remission and MRD pre-HCT were associated with higher relapse probability. In a Cox model, either two or more regimens needed to achieve remission or the presence of both pre-HCT MRD and CNS disease were approximately equally predictive of increased relapse risk. In patients with ALL, CNS disease was more highly associated with relapse risk than MRD. For those who were MRD negative, based on 19 total patients, the presence of CNS disease at diagnosis (n=2) was significantly associated with higher relapse risk (p<0.0001)
Conclusion:
We identified CNS involvement at diagnosis as a novel risk factor associated
with relapse risk after alloHCT. This may be due to inherent biologic
differences leading to higher risk disease, or as a sanctuary site, the CNS may
be less amenable to an allogeneic effect. These patients may benefit from earlier
or more intensive CNS-directed therapy to reduce relapse risk. Validation of
these risk factors in a larger population and development of a prognostic score
to identify those at highest risk of relapse in addition to a biology study to
evaluate for MRD in the CNS using flow cytometery is planned. The goal is for prospective
use of this prognostic tool in the development of relapse prevention trials.
Yes 11 7 64% Acute myelogenous leukemia No 15 3 20% Yes 11 4 36% Mixed phenotype acute leukemia No 8 3 38% Yes 1 0 0% Figure 1: RFS by CNS Disease at Diagnosis