235 Clofarabine Salvage in Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Before Allogeneic Stem Cell Tranplant

Track: Contributed Abstracts
Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 6:45 PM-7:45 PM
Hall 1 (Salt Palace Convention Center)
Lisa Ostrosky Sproat, MD, MSW , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Jeff Betcher, BS Pharm , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Rochelle Chiffelle, DNP , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Susan Gerber, PA-C , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Brooke Loewen, PA-C , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Jane Olsen, NP , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Jane Palmer, NP , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Angela Toro, NP , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Roberta Adams, MD , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Veena Fauble, MD , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Nandita Khera, MD , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Jose Leis, MD, PhD , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Pierre Noel, MD , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Ruben A. Mesa, MD, FACP , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Craig Reeder, MD , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Raoul Tibes, MD, PhD , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
James Slack, MD , Hematology Oncology/Blood and Marrow Transplant, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Introduction: Refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is incurable unless allogeneic stem cell transplant (HCT) is performed. Remission or bone marrow aplasia is not attainable in many and thus they do not proceed to HCT. Clofarabine has been used in these patients but may be associated with increased risk of fungal infection and veno occlusive disease (VOD) and is expensive. In refractory AML patients who fail at least one prior salvage therapy, we administer clofarabine with plan for HCT in bone marrow aplasia. This study reviews outcome in these patients. The ability of clofarabine to achieve aplasia (with or without residual AML) , assess how many patients were able to proceed to HCT and describe the incidence of fungal infection, VOD incidence and relapse free survival after HCT was evaluated.

Patients/Methods: 15 patients with refractory AML received clofarabine between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2012. Retrospective chart review was performed for demographic data, disease characteristics, pathology results and outcomes data. Specific data on fungal disease, ability to achieve aplastic bone marrow (defined as <10% cellularity approximately 14 days after treatment), subsequent treatment with HCT and mortality data after treatment were collected.

Results: See Table 1. Clofarabine was given alone (8 patients), or in combination with other agents: clofarabine plus cytarabine (5 patients) and clofarabine, cytarabine and filgrastim (2  patients). 2 (13%) patients developed new fungal infection after clofarabine and there was no incidence of VOD.

Conclusion: Patients with refractory AML have a dismal prognosis and better treatment options are needed. This study confirms prior reports that clofarabine is active in refractory AML and can be used as a cytoreductive bridge to HCT in aplasia. 40% of patients with refractory AML treated with clofarabine in this study are alive (range, day 100 to 365) without evidence of disease after HCT.  No increase in fungal infections was noted after clofarabine and no post HCT VOD observed. These results show favorable outcomes for patients with refractory AML given clofarabine salvage with subsequent HCT in aplasia. Future studies comparing clofarabine to other salvage regimens in refractory AML and analysis of cost efficacy are warranted.

TABLE 1: Results for Aplasia and HCT after Clofarabine Salvage

 

Number (%) Patients

Number (%)

Alive (thru 10/1/12)

Patients Receiving Clofarabine

15 (100%)

6 (40%)

         +Aplasia

9   (60%)

5 (33%)

               +Aplasia,  -AML

5

4 (27%)

              +Aplasia , +AML

4

1  (7%)

         -Aplasia

6   (40%)

1 (7%)

                -Aplasia, -AML

2

1 (7%)

                -Aplasia, +AML

4

0 (0%)

 

 

Number (%)

Alive after HCT

Patients receiving HCT

10  (67%)

6 (60%) *

         +Aplasia

8

5 (50%)

                +Aplasia, -AML

6

4

               +Aplasia, +AML

2

1 **

        -Aplasia

2

1 (10%)

                 -Aplasia, -AML

2

 

                -Aplasia, +AML

0

0

*range day 100-365

**11 months post HCT

Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>