345 An Identical Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Regimen Prior to Allogeneic (allo) Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in 222 Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Monocenter Experience

Track: Contributed Abstracts
Saturday, February 16, 2013, 6:45 PM-7:45 PM
Hall 1 (Salt Palace Convention Center)
Didier Blaise, MD , Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, Cedex 9, France
Luca Castagna , Unité de Greffe, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, MARSEILLE, France
Geoffroy Venton , Unité de Greffe, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
Roberto Crocchiolo , Unité de Greffe, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
Jean EL-Cheikh , Unité de Greffe, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
Sabine Furst, MD , Institut Paoli Calmettes
Claire Oudin , Institut Paoli-
Angela Granata , Unité de Greffe, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
Norbert Vey , Hematologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
Réda Bouabdallah , Hematologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
Christian Chabannon, MD, PhD , Transplant and Cellular Therapy Unit, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, Cedex 9, France

Introduction: we have treated 222 consecutive patients eligible for allo HSCT with the same RIC from June 2005 up to March 2012. We particularly studied the impact of age, donor source and of the recent disease risk index (DRI) published by Amand et al (Blood 2012)

Patients and methods: all patients were treated for hematologic malignancies and were prepared with Fludarabin (30 mg/m˛/D x 5 D, IV Busulfan (3.2 mg/Kg/D x 2 D, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) (2.5 mg/Kg/D x 2 D). All patients received CSA from D-1 with the addition of MMF in case of MMUD as post graft immunosuppression.

Results: as for August 2012, follow-up is 24 months (4-77). Patients characteristics are presented in table 1; median age was 58 years with 45% and 30% of the patients presenting with a HCT-SCI > 2 and a high or very high DRI respectively. 50% of donors were related siblings. Analyses of outcomes are presented in table 2. Age only influenced NRM (p=0.21). Donor origin has no influence on any outcome variable. DRI influenced OS (p=0.000017) (figure 1), PFS (p=0.00045) (Figure 2), relapse (p=0.0073) and at a lesser degree NRM (p=0.056)

Table 1

*

Total

 N

222

Age

58 (20-72)

HCT-SCI 0-1/2/>3

53/54/90

PS  90-100/70-80/50-60

107/108/7

AML/ALL/MDS/NHL and HD/MM/others

76/10/22/71/35/8

Disease Risk index

Low/Int/High/VHigh

26/132/58/6

12%/59%/26%/3%

MRD/MUD/ MMUD

111/77/34

50%/35%/15%

Table 2

n

2-y OS

2-y PFS

2-y RR

2-y NRM

All patients

222

64%

54%

28%

20%

Low DRI

26 (12%

92%

69%

8%

13%

Int DRI

132 (59%)

69%

56%

27%

21%

High/VHigh DRI

64 (29%)

43%

40%

38%

31%

> 58 years

< 58 years

120

102

61%

67%

50%

60%

/

/

27%

16%

MRD

111

67%

53%

/

16%

MUD+ MMUD

111

60%

55%

/

28%

                                                                         

PFS

OS

High-VHigh

High-VHigh

Int

Low

Int

Low

Figure 1.                                                              Figure 2.

Conclusions: Overall results are promising. They validate the previously published DRI and indicate populations where efforts should be focused. Interestingly results are similar whatever the donor is.

* HCT-SCI: hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index; MRD: Matched related donor; MUD: Matched unrelated donor; MMUD: Mismatched unrelated donor