7
Effect of Antithymocyte Globulin Source on Outcomes of Bone Marrow Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia

Track: BMT Tandem "Scientific" Meeting
Wednesday, February 26, 2014, 4:45 PM-6:45 PM
Texas B (Gaylord Texan)
Joseph H. Antin, MD , Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
H Joachim Deeg, MD , Clinical Research Division, Transplantation Biology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
Sandra Korman , CIBMTR, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Carmem Bonfim, MD , Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Ryotaro Nakamura, MD , Hematology/Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
Mary M. Horowitz, MD, MS , Department of Medicine, CIBMTR and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Daniel J. Weisdorf, MD , University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Mary Eapen, MBBS, MS , CIBMTR, CIBMTR/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Michael A. Pulsipher, MD , Primary Children's Medical Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

Both prospective and retrospective studies indicate that in primary immunosuppressive therapy of severe aplastic anemia (SAA), the use of horse antithymocyte globulin (hATG) results in higher response rates and better long term outcomes than rabbit ATG (rATG). However, rATG results in more profound and durable immunosuppression than hATG; thus, the relative benefit might be different when used in the setting of transplantation conditioning. We previously showed that bone marrow (BM) is a preferable stem cell source to PBSC in SAA (Eapen et al Blood. 2011), and we limited this analysis to patients given BM. We analyzed the outcomes of 699 SAA patients registered between 2007 and 2011 with the CIBMTR who were transplanted from HLA-identical sibling (MRD) or unrelated donors (URD) and received ATG as part of the conditioning regimen.  Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.  Patients with URD transplants had a longer delay from diagnosis and were more likely to receive low dose TBI-based conditioning.

Related

Unrelated

hATG

rATG

hATG

rATG

N

214

233

88

164

Male n(%)

121(57)

130 (56)

46(52)

91(55)

Median age (range)

16(1–68)

19(2–65)

20(1–66)

17(1–67)

Diagnosis to BMT

        <6 months

169(79)

163(70)

12 (14)

31 (19)

        6 – 12 months

22(10)

42(18)

39 (44)

48(29)

        ≥ 1 year

23(11)

28(12)

37(42)

84(51)

Conditioning

        Cy/ATG

198 (93)

168 (72)

8(9)

2(1)

        Cy/ATG/Flu

16 (7)

65 (28)

9(10)

45(27)

        Cy/ATG/TBI (3-8Gy)

__

__

4 (5)

5 (3)

        Cy/ATG/TBI (2Gy)

__

__

38 (43)

30 (18)

        Cy/ATG/Flu/TBI (2Gy)

__

__

28 (32)

70 (43)

        ATG /other

__

__

1(1)

12(7)

GVHD Prophylaxis, N (%)

        Tacrolimus-containing

63 (29)

49 (21)

36 (41)

58 (35)

        Cyclosporine-containing

151 (71)

184 (79)

52 (59)

106 (65)

The proportions of patients achieving an ANC of 500/μL by 28 days were similar with rATG and hATG: MRD 90 vs. 88% (p=0.52), and URD, 86 vs. 90% ( p=0.30).  The corresponding incidence of platelet recovery by 100 days was 94 vs. 95% and 86 vs. 75%, respectively.  However, the incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD by day 100 was lower with rATG than with hATG for both MRD: 2 vs. 15% (p=0.01) and with URD transplants 23 vs. 43% (p=0.06). Chronic GVHD was lower with rATG at 1-year in MRD 5 vs. 12% (p=0.02), but both products gave similar risks of cGVHD in URD 16 vs. 14% (p=0.63). Overall cGVHD risk was low, and there was no significant difference at 3 years: MRD 9 vs. 13% (p=0.25) and URD 19 vs. 21% (p=0.75). Survival at 100 days was better with hATG in MRD transplants 97 vs. 94% (p=0.05) but not URD transplants 88 vs. 83% (p=0.25). However, 1 year survival was similar with both ATG formulations in MRD 92 vs. 92% (p=.92) and in URD 80 vs. 71% (p=0.16), although in both settings rATG was slightly superior. Thus, rATG use leads to significantly less aGVHD in both MRD and URD transplantation. While an advantage in survival was noted in URD receiving rATG, at the power of this study statistical significance was not achieved.

Disclosures:
Nothing To Disclose
Previous Presentation | Next Presentation >>