27
Geriatric Assessment (GA) to Predict Survival in Older Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) Recipients

Track: BMT Tandem "Scientific" Meeting
Friday, February 28, 2014, 10:30 AM-12:00 PM
Texas B (Gaylord Texan)
Lori Muffly, MD, MS , Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, CO
Masha Kocherginsky, PhD , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Wendy Stock, MD , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Quynh Chu , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Michael R. Bishop, MD , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Lucy Godley, MD, PhD , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Justin Kline, MD , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Hongtao Liu, MD , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Olatoyosi Odenike, MD , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Richard Larson, MD , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Koen van Besien, MD , Cornell, New York, NY
Andrew S. Artz, MD, MS , University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

BACKGROUND

GA predicts for mortality in older solid tumor cancer patients but its prognostic value in allogeneic HCT has not previously been reported.

METHODS

Patients >=50 years were eligible.  GA was performed within 1 month prior to HCT, and evaluated function and disability, frailty, comorbidity, mental health, nutrition, and inflammation with the following measures: ECOG performance status (PS), Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), SF-36 Physical Component Summary, Fried Frailty Index (incorporates walk speed and grip strength), HCT- Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale- Geriatrics, SF-36 Mental Component Summary (SF36-MCS), serum albumin, self-reported weight loss, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP). Survival curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier method; log-rank test compared groups.  Multivariate models for 2-year overall survival (OS) incorporated each GA variable significant at P <0.10 in univariate analysis, adjusting for standard HCT variables (age, HCT-CI, conditioning regimen intensity, disease risk).   

RESULTS

203 adults >=50 years completed GA and underwent HCT.  Mean age was 59 years (range 50-73); 45% had high disease risk, 76% received reduced intensity conditioning, and 14% underwent cord blood HCT. With median follow-up of 36 months, IADL limitations (P < 0.0001), slow walk speed (P = 0.01), low SF36-MCS (P = 0.01), and high CRP (P <0.001) were significantly associated with inferior OS, independent of standard HCT variables.  The prognostic effect of these GA variables was greater in older recipients (Table 1). We then created a simple risk score with 1 point for the most prognostic functional measure (IADL impairment) and 1 point for comorbidity (HCT-CI >=3).  This significantly stratified outcomes, particularly in those ³60 years, such that 2-year OS was 63%, 29%, and 0% for 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

GA measures confer independent prognostic utility in older HCT recipients, especially in those >=60 years.  Implementation of GA prior to HCT may aid in appropriate selection of older adults for HCT.

Table 1. Multivariate OS Analysis

     Total Cohort HR     95% CI       P

    50-59 Years

HR    95% CI     P

       60-73 Years

 HR    95% CI       P

STANDARD

VARIABLES

Age >60

1.83

1.26-2.65

.001

HCT-CI >=3

1.56

1.07-2.28

.02

1.50

.88-2.53

.13

1.72

.99-2.98

.05

Active Disease

1.31

.90-1.90

.16

1.54

.92-2.58

.10

1.27

.71-2.27

.42

Ablative Regimen

1.54

1.02-2.31

.04

2.14

1.24-3.69

.01

1.07

.54-2.10

.85

GA VARIABLES

IADL Impairment

2.38

1.59-3.56

<.001

1.86

1.07-3.24

.03

3.25

1.75-6.05

<.001

Slow Walk Speed

1.80

1.14-2.83

.01

1.16

.60-2.28

.66

3.27

1.68-6.39

.001

Reduced Mental Health

1.67

1.13-2.48

.01

1.55

.92-2.62

.10

1.87

1.01-3.49

.04

Low Albumin

1.52

.94-2.46

.09

1.23

.57-2.63

.60

2.62

1.26-5.47

.01

High CRP

2.51

1.54-4.09

<.001

1.89

.94-3.79

.07

3.13

1.52-6.46

.002

*Each GA measure analyzed separately, adjusting for standard variables

Disclosures:
Nothing To Disclose