404
Endoscopy Biopsy in Different Sites for the Diagnosis of Lower and Upper Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Track: Poster Abstracts
Saturday, March 1, 2014, 6:45 PM-7:45 PM
Longhorn Hall E (Exhibit Level 1) (Gaylord Texan)
Morgani Rodrigues , Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Dept, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Erika MM Costa , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Alessandro de Moura Almeida , Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Reijane Alves de Assis , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Fernanda Nazare Cardoso Santos , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Erika Abdon Oliveira , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Denise da Cunha Pasqualin , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Alanna MPS Bezerra , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Iracema Esteves , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Karine SN Barroso , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Fabio R. Kerbauy, MD , Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Dept, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Jose Mauro Kutner , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Andreza Feitosa Ribeiro, PhD , Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Dept, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Jairo J. N. Sobrinho, MD , Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Dept, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Margareth Torres, DOCTOR , LIG Laboratorio de Imunogenética, Sao Paulo, ., Brazil
Juliana Fernandes , Stem Cell Transplant Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Arnaldo Ganc , Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Nelson Hamerschlak, MD, PhD , Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Dept, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Introduction

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a major cause of mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This study assessed the distribution and concordance of GvHD in upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) biopsies and its correlation with CMV infection and extra-intestinal manifestations of GvHD.

Methods

We performed a review of records from patients that had undergone ASCT from 2005 to 2013 in our institution and had GI GvHD diagnosis by histological samples from upper and/or lower endoscopy. We also evaluate presence of extra-intestinal manifestations of GvHD at the time of biopsy and CMV infection on histological and blood samples.

Results

One hundred and eighty nine patients had performed ASCT during this period. Twenty eight patients (14.8%) had upper and/or lower acute GvHD diagnosis confirmed by biopsy. Extra-intestinal manifestation of GVHD was: skin in 19 (67.9%) and liver in 6 (21.4%) patients. Five (17.9%) had the 3 organ involvement. The GI GvHD staging was: I in 7 (25%), II in 4 (14.3%), III in 9 (32.1%) and IV in 8 (28.6%) patients.

The frequency and correlation between involvement of different parts of GI-GVHD are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3. 

Nine (32.1%) had a positive blood sample for CMV and 5 (17.9%) had a histological sample (one in stomach, 3 in colon and one in rectum). Only one patient had both positive samples. There is no association between GI-GVHD staging and CMV infection on blood (p=0.885) and on biopsy (p= 0.859).

The median follow up was 7.2 (1.8-90.6) month. Overall survival was 40% in 60 months and patients with stage IV GVHD had a less survival ( P= 0.004).

Conclusion

Because sigmoid tract was the most frequent site of lower GI-GVHD involvement and only in 7.4% of cases failed to identify this disease, a retosigmoidoscopy may be an effective procedure for GI-GVHD diagnosis. However, CMV infection may be underdiagnosed with this approach.

Table 1. Correlation between involvement of different parts of gastrointestinal tract – rectal biopsy versus colon/ileum biopsies

ColonIleumBiopsy

Positive

Colon/IleumBiopsy

Negative

Total

Rectal biopsy – Positive

16

7

23 (85.2)

Rectal biopsy Negative

2

2

4 (14.8)

Total

18 (66.7)

9 (33.3)

27 (100)

p-value = 0.180 (Mc Nemar test)

Table 2. Correlation between involvement of different parts of gastrointestinal tract – rectal biopsy versus stomach biopsies

Stomach biopsy – Positive

Stomach biopsy Negative

Total

Rectal biopsy – Positive

8

2

10 (37)

Rectal biopsy Negative

10

7

17 (63)

Total

18 (66.7)

9 (33.3)

27 (100)

p-value = 0.039 (Mc Nemar test)

Table 3. Correlation between involvement of different parts of gastrointestinal tract – colon/ileum biopsies versus stomach biopsies

ColonIleumBiopsy

Positive

Colon/IleumBiopsy

Negative

Total

Stomach biopsy – Positive

9

14

23 (85.2)

Stomach biopsy Negative

1

3

4 (14.8)

Total

10 (37)

17 (63)

27 (100)

p-value = 0.001 (Mc Nemar test)

Disclosures:
Nothing To Disclose
See more of: Poster Session 2: GVH/GVL
See more of: Poster Abstracts