184 Ex-Utero Plus in Utero Collection of Umbilical Cord Blood (CB) for Banking Yields Higher Total Nucleated Cell Counts (TNC) Compared to Either Procedure Alone

Track: Poster Abstracts
Wednesday, February 11, 2015, 6:45 PM-7:45 PM
Grand Hall CD (Manchester Grand Hyatt)
Chitra Hosing, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Mark Munsell , Biostatistices, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Sue Armitage , Cord Blood Bank Program, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Tara Sadeghi , Cord Blood Bank Program, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Katy Rezvani, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Betul Oran, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
David Marin , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Suzanne Dworsky , Stem Cell Transplantation Lab, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Uday R. Popat, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Jeffrey Wilson , Stem Cell Transplantation, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Amin Alousi, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Nina Shah, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Amanda Olson, M.D. , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Roy B. Jones, MD, PhD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Partow Kebriaei, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Muzaffar H. Qazilbash, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Ian McNiece, PhD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Simrit Parmar, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Richard E. Champlin, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Elizabeth J. Shpall, MD , Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Presentation recording not available for download or distribution as requested by the presenting author.
BACKGROUND: Collecting high quality cord blood units (CBU) is important because  the TNC and CD34+ cell dose of a CBU correlates with transplant outcomes. There are 2 techniques for collecting CBU: while the placenta is still in-utero by midwives/obstetricians or after placental delivery by trained personal (ex-utero). The MD Anderson Cord Blood Bank uses a combination of the 2 (in+ex utero) techniques whenever feasible. The aim of this analysis was to compare the 3 techniques (in-utero, ex-utero, in+ex-utero). METHODS:  CBUs collected between 04/2005 and 7/2011 were retrospectively analyzed. If logistically feasible, an in-utero collection followed immediately by ex-utero collection was performed. The total volume, pre- and post-processing TNC, viable CD34+ cells and microbial contamination was evaluated in the 3 groups. Analysis of variance methods was used to compare the 3 groups with respect to pre- and post-processing TNC and total viable CD34+ cells. Tukey’s honestly significant difference method was used for pair-wise comparisons of the 3 groups. Microbial contamination between the groups was compared using chi square test. RESULTS:  Total of 32,738 CBUs were collected and 23,968 units were processed. The pre-processing TNC was significantly higher in the in-utero vs. ex-utero collections.  There was also a significantly higher pre-processing TNC in the in+ex utero collection vs. the in-utero collection. Similar results were noted in the post-processing TNC. The median viable CD34+ cells collected were 5.03, 4.26, and 4.93 (x 106) respectively in the in-utero, ex-utero and in+ex utero groups, respectively (P< 0.0001 for in-utero vs. ex-utero and ex-utero vs. in+ex-utero groups). There was no statistically significant difference in the microbial contamination in the in-utero vs. in+ex utero groups, however it was lower in the ex-utero collection as compared to either the in-utero or in+ex utero collections. CONCLUSION:  We conclude that in+ex utero collection of umbilical CB for banking is safe and results in significantly higher TNCs than either technique alone.

 

In-Utero

Ex-Utero

In+Ex Utero

In-Utero vs. Ex-Utero

In-Utero vs. In+Ex Utero

Ex-Utero vs.

In+Ex Utero

 

 

 

 

P value

P-value

P-value

Volume (ml)

     Median

     (Range)

N=8,906

64.0

(0.5-225.3)

N=6,305

54.0

(0.2-289.0)

N=17,527

77.1

(2.0-289.1)

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

Pre-Processing TNC (x107)

     Median

     (Range)

N=6,133

108.8

(15.3-1144.8)

N=3,514

101.0

(13.7-829.5)

N=14,321

118.9

(9-1359.1)

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

Post-Processing TNC (x107)

     Median

     (Range)

N=4,009

113.4

(13.4-602.0)

N=2,124

105.4

(3.8-459.8)

N=9,559

118.4

(28.9-679.7)

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

Post-processing CD34+ cells

( x106)

     Median

     (Range)

 

N=3,857

5.03

(0.36-57.64)

N=2,009

4.26

(0-53.03)

N=9,069

4.93

(0.03-63.36)

< 0.0001

0.7670

< 0.0001

Microbial Contamination (%)

N=4,051

2.0

N=2,107

0.5

N=9,503

2.0

< 0.0001

0.8278

< 0.0001

.

Disclosures:
Nothing To Disclose
Previous Presentation | Next Presentation >>