We retrospectively analyzed a total of 59 adult patients with advanced hematologic malignancies including refractory AML(n=32), CML with blastic crisis (n=14), refractory ALL (n=8) and others (n=5) who received allogeneic SCT with intensified myeloablative conditioning regimen of busulfan (BU) 8mg/kg + cyclophosphamide 120mg/kg + TBI 10Gy (n=20), melphalan (MEL) 180mg/m2 + BU 8mg/kg + TBI 10Gy (n=32) or MEL180 mg/m2+ TBI 10Gy (n=7) from January 1994 to December 2003 in our institution. GVHD prophylaxis consisted with tacrolimus or cyclosporine and short courses of methotrexate.
The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 8.3 years (0.1-18.8). Median age at transplant was 36 (17-54). Fifty-one patients received BM, 4 received PBSC, 1 received both and 3 received CB; 18 from a matched related donor, 15 from a matched unrelated donor, 7 from a mismatched related donor and 19 from a mismatched unrelated donor. Rejection was observed in only 1 patient. A total of 44.6% and 23.2% of evaluable patients had grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD, respectively and 57.9% of evaluable patients experienced extensive chronic GVHD. Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years was 31.5% and 29.7%, whereas that at 10 years was 28.8% and 23.1%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of TRM at 5 years and 10 years was 40.0% and 42.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with more than 5% circulating blasts (HR2.06, p=0.05) and more than 80% bone marrow blasts (HR2.35, p=0.04) were associated with poor survival. AML (HR0.42, p=0.02) and conditioning regimen of BU+MEL+TBI (HR0.46, p=0.03) were associated with better OS and DFS. SCT from unrelated donors (HR4.01, p=0.01) was independently associated with increased TRM.
In conclusion, our data demonstrate that these intensified myeloablative conditioning could be alternative regimens that provide a long term durable remission and disease-free survival in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies.