207 Immune Recovery (IR) Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (Allo-SCT): A Comparison of Three Different Transplant Strategies at a Single Transplant Center

Track: Poster Abstracts
Wednesday, February 11, 2015, 6:45 PM-7:45 PM
Grand Hall CD (Manchester Grand Hyatt)
Zeina Al-Mansour, MD , Hematology & Oncology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
Mridula George, MD , Department of Medicine, UMass Medical Center, Worcester, MA
Zheng Zhou , Hematology/Oncology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
Glen Raffel, MD, PhD , Hematology/Oncology Section BMT, UMass Medical Center, Worcester, MA
Laura Petrillo-Deluca, PAC , Hematology/Oncology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
Lindsey Shanahan, PAC , Hematology/Oncology - BMT, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
Hongbo Yu, MD, PhD , Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
Bruce A Woda, MD , Hematopathology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
Muthalagu Ramanathan, MD , Hematology/Oncology Section BMT, UMASS Memorial University Campus, Worcester, MA
Jan Cerny, MD, PhD, FACP , Department of Medicine; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
Rajneesh Nath, MD , Department of Medicine; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
Presentation recording not available for download or distribution as requested by the presenting author.
Introduction: Favorable IR after allo-SCT has been reported after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC); however, T-cell depletion and cord blood (CB) SCT have been associated with delay in IR. The goal of this study is to compare the rates of IR using three different transplant strategies employed at UMass Memorial Medical Center.

Patients & Methods:We retrospectively analyzed data of all patient who underwent allo-SCT at our institution since April 2009 using either RIC with thiotepa/fludarabine/melphalan followed by post-transplant cylophosphamide (TFM/Cy arm), RIC with Fludarabine/Busulfanx2/antithymocyte globulin (FluBu2/ATG arm) or CB transplant with TFM/ATG regimen. IR was assessed by rates of recovery of lymphocyte subsets (CD3, CD4, CD19, CD25+127- and NK-cells) and serum immunoglobulins (Ig’s) at D30, D100 and 1 year post transplant.

Results: 102 patients were identified from the database. 38 patients (37.2%) were included in the TFM/Cy arm, 38 patients (37.2%) in the FluBu2/ATG arm and 26 patients (25.5%) in the CB arm. Median age of all patients was 62.2 years (range 18.4 – 83.5) and 52.4, 67.5, and 63 years in the TFM/Cy, FluBu2/ATG and CB arms, respectively. Median lymphocyte subset counts and Ig levels at different post transplant points are detailed in Table-1. CD3 and CD4 recovery was significantly inferior in the CB arm at D30 and D100. There was a trend towards delayed IR of regulatory T-cells (CD25+127-) in the CB arm at all points. CD19 and NK-cell recovery was superior in the CB arm at all points, but NK-cell recovery did not reach statistical significance at 1 year. Recovery of serum Ig’s was noted to be faster in the FluBu2/ATG arm early on post transplant. At 1-year post allo-SCT, Ig values were comparable in all arms.

Conclusion: Our results show that CB allo-SCT with TFM/ATG conditioning was associated with faster recovery of NK-cells and CD19 cell; however with delayed recovery of T-lymphocyte subsets. Recovery of T-lymphocyte subsets was almost comparable in both arms receiving allo-SCT with RIC regimen regardless of the use of post-tx Cy vs ATG.  FluBu2/ATG regimen was associated with faster recovery of serum Ig’s in the early post-transplant period. 

 

Cells/mm3

All Patients

 

TFM/Cy

 

FluBu2/ATG

 

CB

 

P value

CD3-  D30

          D100

          1 year

284

518

669

376

598.5

744.5

277

1159

690

16.5

125

244

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.13

CD4-  D30

          D100

          1 year

100

175

251

111

189

293

129.5

276

269

4

53

141

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.08

CD19-  D30

           D100

           1 year

2

41.5

184.5

1

24

204

8

73.5

96

2

273.5

925

<0.0001

0.03

0.01

T-reg   D30

           D100

           1 year

14

18.5

22

16

20

21.5

10.5

29.1

38

2

5.5

12.5

0.06

0.13

0.14

NK-cells- D30

              D100

              1 year

136

150

143

29

110

132.5

205

201

148

264

269

166

<0.0001

0.001

0.53

IgA- D30

        D100

        1 year

59

60.5

58

46

26

51

147

131

45

54

33.5

77.5

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.13

IgG- D30

        D100

        1 year

593

612

760

534

494

784

763

656

742

548

592

878

0.01

0.45

0.46

IgM-  D30

         D100

         1 year

29

30.2

52.2

23.1

17.0

42.2

58.6

80.2

53.8

28.1

58.9

81.1

0.01

<0.0001

0.25

Disclosures:
J. Cerny, Ariad Pharmaceuticals Inc., ad hoc advisory board: Advisory Board and Honoraria
Pfizer Inc., ad hoc advisory board: Advisory Board and Honoraria
Spectrum Inc., ad hoc advisory board: Advisory Board and Honoraria
Incyte Inc., ad hoc advisory board: Advisory Board and Honoraria

R. Nath, Celgene, ad hoc advisory board: Advisory Board and Honoraria
Previous Presentation | Next Presentation >>