Introduction: AutoHCT is a potentially curative modality for Rel/Ref HL. However, large studies evaluating the risk factors predicting outcomes of autoHCT in CAYA with Rel/Ref HL have not been performed.
Methods: CAYA (age <30yrs) with Rel/Ref classical HL undergoing autoHCT during 1995-2010 were eligible. HIV+ patients and those undergoing tandem HCT were excluded.
Results: Baseline characteristics of 671 CAYA included in the analysis are shown in Table. The 3yr non-relapse mortality (NRM), rate of relapse/progression (R/P), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6%, 38%, 56% and 73%, respectively. On multivariate analysis non-ABVD/ABVD-like 1st line therapy (RR 1.8; p=0.03) was associated with a higher NRM. Factors predicting higher risk of R/P included Lansky score (LS) or KPS<90 (RR 1.6; p=0.0006), extranodal disease (END) (RR 1.6; p=0.001), resistant disease (RR 1.8; p<0.0001) and CBV conditioning (RR 1.6; p=0.002). Long first complete remission (LgCR1; ≥1yr) was associated with a reduced R/P risk (RR 0.6; p=0.003). MVA for PFS identified END (RR 1.5; p=0.001), resistant disease (RR 1.9; p<0.0001) and KPS<90 (RR 1.5; p=0.0004) as risk factors for therapy failure; while LgCR1 (0.7; p=0.006) was predictive of reduced therapy failure risk. Finally for OS, non-ABVD/ABVD-like 1st line therapy (RR 1.5; p=0.001), END (RR 1.7; p=.0003) and resistant disease (RR 2.3; p<0.0001) were associated with higher mortality; while LgCR1 (RR 0.5; p=0.0006) and peripheral blood graft (RR 0.49, p=0.0001) were associated with reduced mortality risk. Age was not predictive of autoHCT outcomes.
Conclusions: Unlike adult HL patients, age is not a prognostic factor for CAYA outcomes following autoHCT. In this largest CAYA study to date; LgCR1, LS/KPS, chemoresistance, END and non-ABVD/ABVD-like 1st line therapy emerge as factors predicting autoHCT survival outcomes in CAYA with HL. These data help identify potential high risk Rel/Ref CAYA with HL, where investigation of novel post autoHCT (maintenance, consolidation, immunomodulatory etc.) approaches is warranted.
Baseline characteristics | N=671 (%) |
Median age (range) | 23 (3-29) |
<21 yrs | 230 (34) |
KPS ≥90 | 498 (74) |
Duration of 1st CR <12mons (including primary refractory) ≥12mons Missing | 361 (54) 237 (35) 73 (11) |
Time from diagnosis to HCT, mons (range) | 19 (3-238) |
High LDH at HCT | 174 (26) |
Median lines of therapies (range) | 2 (1-5) |
ABVD or ABVD-like 1st line therapy | 396 (59) |
END at HCT | 118 (18) |
Bulky disease at HCT | 77 (11) |
Disease status at HCT Sensitive Resistant Missing | 529 (79) 125 (19) 17 ( 3) |
Radiation post HCT | 205 (31) |
Conditioning BEAM CBV Others | 455 (68) 80 (12) 136 ( 20) |
Graft type BM PB | 65 (10) 606 (90) |
Median follow-up, mons (range) | 64 (4-216) |
See more of: BMT Tandem "Scientific" Meeting