Introduction:
The optimal management of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in patients undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) remains poorly defined. We reviewed the management of catheter-related thrombosis in ASCT patients in our transplant unit over an 8-year period.
Methods:
We reviewed all patients undergoing ASCT at Thomas Jefferson University from 2006-2013. Patients with previous history of venous thrombosis receiving anticoagulation at ASCT were excluded. Patients with CRT were identified and management was reviewed. Three populations were identified: No CRT, CRT no anticoagulation, and CRT on anticoagulation. We performed a Wilcoxon Ranks Sum analysis to evaluate blood and platelet utilization in the three groups. We also reviewed major bleeding events (MBE) and secondary thrombotic events (pulmonary embolism, PE).
Results:
We identified 214 patients as described in Table 1. The incidence of CRT for the whole group was 11.2%. Of the 24 patients with CRT, 46% were treated with AC and the remaining was observed without AC. The median number of pooled platelets transfused was 14 in the CRT + AC group, 4 in the no CRT and 4 CRT with no anticoagulation groups (p=0.02). The median number of PRBC transfusions in the no CRT, CRT + AC, and CRT with no AC groups was, 2, 4, and 2, respectively (p=0.01). None of the patients with CRT developed a second thrombotic event (PE). Incidence of major bleeding within the CRT + AC group was 27% while in the CRT and no AC group was 15% (p=NS). One patient expired due to the result of a subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Conclusions:
A strategy utilizing AC for CRT in the setting of an autologous transplant results in increased utilization of both platelet and PRBC transfusion and is associated with a trend towards a higher risk of major bleeding. There was no difference in the incidence of PE following CRT in patients treated with or without AC in this small cohort of ASCT patients.
Table 1: Patient Characteristics | |||
| No CRT | CRT + Anticoagulation | CRT with no anticoagulation |
Number of patients | 190 | 11 | 13 |
Median age at transplant (year) | 58 | 62 | 60 |
Male gender | 116 | 6 | 10 |
Ethnicity: Caucasian African Asian Hispanic Other/Unknown | 122 47 7 6 8 | 7 2 0 2 0 | 12 1 0 0 0 |
Mailgnancy: Myeloma Non-Hodgkins' lymphoma Hodgkins' lymphoma Primary amyloidosis CLL AML APML Other | 132 34 12 3 2 2 1 4 | 8 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 | 8 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 |
Conditioning: Melphalan alone BEAM Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide Cyclophosphamide alone Unknown | 135 48 2 4 1 | 9 2 0 0 0 | 10 3 0 0 0 |
Neutrophil engraftment (in days) | 11 | 12 | 12 |
Platelet engraftment (in days) | 15 | 17 | 17 |
Table 2: Outcome analysis | ||||
| No CRT | CRT + Anticoagulation | CRT with no anticoagulation | p-value |
Platelet utilization (Number of pooled platelet units) | 4 | 14 | 4 | 0.02 |
PRBC cell utilization (Number of PRBC transfusions) | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0.01 |