434 Paradoxical Effect of Donor Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Status on CMV Reactivation after T-Cell Depleted (TCD) Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT)

Track: Poster Abstracts
Saturday, February 14, 2015, 6:45 PM-7:45 PM
Grand Hall CD (Manchester Grand Hyatt)
Yao-Ting Huang, PhD, MPH , Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Julia Foldi, PhD , Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Kun Xiao, MD MPH , Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Dick Chung , Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Dionysios Neofytos, MD , Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Yovanna Kolitsopoulos, BS , Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Molly Maloy, MS , Department of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Sergio A. Giralt, MD , Department of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Esperanza Papadopoulos, MD , Department of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Ann A. Jakubowski, PhD, MD , Department of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD , Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Presentation recording not available for download or distribution as requested by the presenting author.
Background:  CMV recipient seropositivity (R+) is a predictor for CMV viremia after SCT. Cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) are critical for CMV immunity.  Conventional allografts from CMV seropositive donors (D+) confer some CMV immunity though transfer of donor CTLs to the recipient. Thus for CMV R+, CMV D+ are preferentially chosen over CMV D-.  In contrast, ex-vivo T-cell depleted (TCD) allografts are deficient in CMV CTLs. The effect of donor serostatus on CMV reactivation has not been examined after TCD SCT.  We studied the effect of CMV donor serostatus on the incidence of CMV viremia in a cohort of adult CMV R+, TCD SCT monitored by CMV PCR and treated preemptively.

Methods: CMV R+ adults with hematologic malignancies who received peripheral blood  CD34+ selected allografts after myeloablative conditioning regimens from March 1, 2010 through May 2013 were monitored prospectively by CMV PCR at least weekly from day (d) +14 through +100 and at least once every 2 weeks through d +180. Preemptive therapy was initiated for CMV viremia, defined as ≥ 1 positive PCR value.  There was no CMV prophylaxis during the study period. Follow up was through May 31, 2014. Time-dependent Cox-proportional hazard model of univariate and multivariate stepwise selection analyses were performed to identify predictors of CMV viremia.

Results: Of 113 CMV R+ (median age 57.6 years, 22.5-73.0), 60(53%) had acute leukemia, 23 (20%) myelodysplastic syndrome, 18 (16%) multiple myeloma and 12 (11%) other. Donors were 48 (42%) matched-related (MRD), 45 (40%) matched unrelated (MUD), or 20 (18%) mismatched; 68 (60%) CMV D+ or 45 (40%) D-. The cumulative incidence of CMV viremia at 6 months was 79%. Time to onset of viremia was median 26 days (13-83) after SCT, and time to resolution of viremia a median 30.5 days from onset of viremia. The incidence of CMV  viremia was higher in R+/D+ compared to R+/D- (90.5% versus 62.2%; P<0.0001). Median time to onset and to resolution for R+/D+ vs R+/D- were not significantly different. In multivariable analysis, R+/D- pts were at lower risk for CMV viremia compared to R+/D+ (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.36-0.90; P=0.017). In contrast, multiple myeloma (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.24-3.98; P=0.008) was associated with increased risk compared with acute leukemia. Having a mismatched donor was also associated with increased risk (HR: 1.78, 95% CI: 0.98-3.23; P=0.058) compared with MRD and (HR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.26-4.21; P=0.007) with MUD.

Conclusions:  1) Among CMV R+ TCD recipients, the incidence of CMV viremia was 79%. 2)  In multivariate analysis, CMV D- with decreased risk for CMV viremia compared to D+. 3) Diagnosis of multiple myeloma and allografts from mismatched donor was associated with increased risk. 4) Further studies are needed to assess the effect of CMV donor serostatus in transplant outcomes in TCD. If validated in larger cohorts, our findings have implications for donor selection and targeted strategies for CMV prevention.

Disclosures:
Nothing To Disclose